5 minutes
The Antelope and Cuyama valleys could see temperatures as high as 106 degrees.
The Antelope and Cuyama valleys could see temperatures as high as 106 degrees.
12 minutes
ആരോഗ്യമേഖലയെ ആശങ്കയിലാക്കുന്നതാണ് ബജറ്റ്. കടം വീട്ടാനും ദൈനംദിനകാര്യങ്ങളുടെ ചെലവിനുമായി പൊതുമേഖലാ സ്ഥാപനങ്ങളെ വിറ്റഴിക്കുന്നതായിരിക്കും നയമെന്ന സൂചനയാണ് ബജറ്റിലുള്ളത്
ആരോഗ്യമേഖലയെ ആശങ്കയിലാക്കുന്നതാണ് ബജറ്റ്. കടം വീട്ടാനും ദൈനംദിനകാര്യങ്ങളുടെ ചെലവിനുമായി പൊതുമേഖലാ സ്ഥാപനങ്ങളെ വിറ്റഴിക്കുന്നതായിരിക്കും നയമെന്ന സൂചനയാണ് ബജറ്റിലുള്ളത്
12 minutes
വളർച്ച കൈവരിക്കാൻ, വികസനം നേടാൻ അന്താരാഷ്ട്രതലത്തിൽ എല്ലാ രാജ്യങ്ങളും സ്വീകരിക്കുന്ന മാർഗം തന്നെയാണ് ധനകമ്മി വികസനം
12 minutes
വളർച്ച കൈവരിക്കാൻ, വികസനം നേടാൻ അന്താരാഷ്ട്രതലത്തിൽ എല്ലാ രാജ്യങ്ങളും സ്വീകരിക്കുന്ന മാർഗം തന്നെയാണ് ധനകമ്മി വികസനം
12 minutes
കേന്ദ്രസർക്കാർ കേരളത്തെ വർഷങ്ങളായി സാന്പത്തിക ഉപരോധത്തിന് വിധേയമാക്കുകയാണ്
കേന്ദ്രസർക്കാർ കേരളത്തെ വർഷങ്ങളായി സാന്പത്തിക ഉപരോധത്തിന് വിധേയമാക്കുകയാണ്
12 minutes
കേന്ദ്രത്തിന്റെ അതേ പാതയിലാണ് സംസ്ഥാന സർക്കാരും
കേന്ദ്രത്തിന്റെ അതേ പാതയിലാണ് സംസ്ഥാന സർക്കാരും
12 minutes
പത്മവിഭൂഷൺ നേടിയ ജസ്റ്റിസ് കെ ടി തോമസ്, ജന്മഭൂമി മുൻ എഡിറ്റർ പി നാരായണൻ, പത്മഭൂഷൺ നേടിയ നടൻ മമ്മൂട്ടി, എസ്എൻഡിപി യോഗം ജനറൽ സെക്രട്ടറി വെള്ളാപ്പള്ളി നടേശൻ എന്നിവർ പുരസ്കാരമേറ്റുവാങ്ങി
പത്മവിഭൂഷൺ നേടിയ ജസ്റ്റിസ് കെ ടി തോമസ്, ജന്മഭൂമി മുൻ എഡിറ്റർ പി നാരായണൻ, പത്മഭൂഷൺ നേടിയ നടൻ മമ്മൂട്ടി, എസ്എൻഡിപി യോഗം ജനറൽ സെക്രട്ടറി വെള്ളാപ്പള്ളി നടേശൻ എന്നിവർ പുരസ്കാരമേറ്റുവാങ്ങി
12 minutes
ക്രിമിനൽ കേസുകളിൽ ഉൾപ്പെട്ടയാളെ കൗൺസിലറായി തുടരാൻ അനുവദിക്കുന്നത് തെറ്റായ സന്ദേശമാണ് നൽകുന്നത്
ക്രിമിനൽ കേസുകളിൽ ഉൾപ്പെട്ടയാളെ കൗൺസിലറായി തുടരാൻ അനുവദിക്കുന്നത് തെറ്റായ സന്ദേശമാണ് നൽകുന്നത്
12 minutes
രാവിലെ പത്തിനാണ് സത്യഗ്രഹം ആരംഭിച്ചത്. ആദ്യദിവസം കൗൺസിലർമാരായ കെ ശ്രീകുമാറും രാഖി രവികുമാറുമാണ് സത്യഗ്രഹമിരുന്നത്
രാവിലെ പത്തിനാണ് സത്യഗ്രഹം ആരംഭിച്ചത്. ആദ്യദിവസം കൗൺസിലർമാരായ കെ ശ്രീകുമാറും രാഖി രവികുമാറുമാണ് സത്യഗ്രഹമിരുന്നത്
17 minutes
The punk scene in Los Angeles exploded in the 1970s and 80s after a community of art-driven, bohemian music fans decided to rebel against mainstream music of the time.
The punk scene in Los Angeles exploded in the 1970s and 80s after a community of art-driven, bohemian music fans decided to rebel against mainstream music of the time.
22 minutes
Satellite imagery from Planet Labs shows at least two buildings at the Sborka semiconductor devices plant in Voronezh were damaged in a Ukrainian missile strike, according to RFE/RL’s investigative project Schemes.
Satellite imagery from Planet Labs shows at least two buildings at the Sborka semiconductor devices plant in Voronezh were damaged in a Ukrainian missile strike, according to RFE/RL’s investigative project Schemes.
24 minutes
Em três anos, foram extintos 41 dos 50 programas de estímulo a iniciativas culturais autônomas. Teatro, música, circo e literatura estão entre as expressões artísticas atingidas. Cortes ocorrem no momento em que Estado recebe recursos da Lei Aldir Blanc The post Como SP ataca as culturas populares appeared first on Outras Palavras.
24 minutes
Em três anos, foram extintos 41 dos 50 programas de estímulo a iniciativas culturais autônomas. Teatro, música, circo e literatura estão entre as expressões artísticas atingidas. Cortes ocorrem no momento em que Estado recebe recursos da Lei Aldir Blanc The post Como SP ataca as culturas populares appeared first on Outras Palavras.
24 minutes
(The Center Square) — Maine is being pressured to ramp up oversight of its Medicaid programs amid increasing federal scrutiny of alleged fraud and wasteful spending. On Tuesday, the group Lead Maine delivered more than 3,000 certified voter signatures to the state Department of Health and Human Services, petitioning the agency to adopt two new rules tightening oversight of MaineCare spending. Under Maine law, a petition to adopt a rule signed by 150 or more registered Maine voters requires the agency to initiate rulemaking within 60 days. Lead Maine collected more than ten times that threshold on each petition, "leaving DHHS a clear legal obligation to act," the group said. “Maine spends more than a billion dollars a year on MaineCare. Every one of those dollars belongs to a taxpayer, and every one is supposed to reach a vulnerable Mainer who needs care," Rep. Laurel Libby, an Auburn Republican and the group's founder and executive director, said in a statement. "More than 1,500 Mainers signed on to each of these common sense ideas." One petition submitted by the group on Tuesday calls for expanding on-site inspections of facilities that receive Medicaid funding by closing what the group called a "loophole" in the law that lets state auditors count a phone call or paperwork review from their office as an “on-site” inspection of a MaineCare provider. The rule would require on-site physical inspections of the facilities and make providers who refuse subject to sanctions. Another petition would allow for the suspension of Medicaid payments to a provider if they receive a notice of improper payment totaling $1,000 or more, according to the group. "If the state says it inspected a provider, an inspector should have actually been there," Libby said. "And if the state catches a provider billing for money it wasn’t owed, it should stop writing checks until the matter is settled." A spokesperson for the Maine Department of Health and Human Services said the agency has received the group's petitions and will review them but defended its anti-fraud protections. "The Department remains committed to protecting the integrity of the MaineCare program, responsibly stewarding state and federal resources, and preserving access to care for the Maine people who rely on MaineCare," the agency said in a statement. "Under Governor Mills, Maine has taken significant actions in recent years to increase oversight and scrutiny of Medicaid providers, including proposing legislation to require licensing standards on several providers for the first time ever." The group's demands come as the Trump administration is threatening a federal takeover if state leaders don't turn over details of state Medicaid payments for an investigation of potential fraud in the program. A January report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General flagged nearly 100 Medicaid payments for autistic rehabilitative and community support services that did not comply with federal and state requirements. The watchdog directed the state to repay at least $28.7 million for the federal share of the payments. Medicaid is jointly funded by states and the federal government. In Maine, the federal government covers most of MaineCare's $5.4 billion in annual spending, with the state contributing about $1.5 billion, according to federal data. Democratic Gov. Janet Mills has pushed back on the claims, referring to CMS Director Mehmet Oz as a "former TV doctor" and accusing the Trump administration of using the allegations of fraud to "punish" Democratic-led states. She notes that MaineCare's improper payment error rate is 2.4%, which is less than half the national average. Vice President JD Vance accused "illegal aliens" of stealing millions of dollars in federal funding from Maine taxpayers during a visit to the state in May, where he announced that the Trump administration is freezing new Medicare enrollments for hospice and home health agencies for the next six months for all states, including Maine. Vance said the move is aimed at protecting people who depend on Medicare and taxpayers.
(The Center Square) — Maine is being pressured to ramp up oversight of its Medicaid programs amid increasing federal scrutiny of alleged fraud and wasteful spending. On Tuesday, the group Lead Maine delivered more than 3,000 certified voter signatures to the state Department of Health and Human Services, petitioning the agency to adopt two new rules tightening oversight of MaineCare spending. Under Maine law, a petition to adopt a rule signed by 150 or more registered Maine voters requires the agency to initiate rulemaking within 60 days. Lead Maine collected more than ten times that threshold on each petition, "leaving DHHS a clear legal obligation to act," the group said. “Maine spends more than a billion dollars a year on MaineCare. Every one of those dollars belongs to a taxpayer, and every one is supposed to reach a vulnerable Mainer who needs care," Rep. Laurel Libby, an Auburn Republican and the group's founder and executive director, said in a statement. "More than 1,500 Mainers signed on to each of these common sense ideas." One petition submitted by the group on Tuesday calls for expanding on-site inspections of facilities that receive Medicaid funding by closing what the group called a "loophole" in the law that lets state auditors count a phone call or paperwork review from their office as an “on-site” inspection of a MaineCare provider. The rule would require on-site physical inspections of the facilities and make providers who refuse subject to sanctions. Another petition would allow for the suspension of Medicaid payments to a provider if they receive a notice of improper payment totaling $1,000 or more, according to the group. "If the state says it inspected a provider, an inspector should have actually been there," Libby said. "And if the state catches a provider billing for money it wasn’t owed, it should stop writing checks until the matter is settled." A spokesperson for the Maine Department of Health and Human Services said the agency has received the group's petitions and will review them but defended its anti-fraud protections. "The Department remains committed to protecting the integrity of the MaineCare program, responsibly stewarding state and federal resources, and preserving access to care for the Maine people who rely on MaineCare," the agency said in a statement. "Under Governor Mills, Maine has taken significant actions in recent years to increase oversight and scrutiny of Medicaid providers, including proposing legislation to require licensing standards on several providers for the first time ever." The group's demands come as the Trump administration is threatening a federal takeover if state leaders don't turn over details of state Medicaid payments for an investigation of potential fraud in the program. A January report by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General flagged nearly 100 Medicaid payments for autistic rehabilitative and community support services that did not comply with federal and state requirements. The watchdog directed the state to repay at least $28.7 million for the federal share of the payments. Medicaid is jointly funded by states and the federal government. In Maine, the federal government covers most of MaineCare's $5.4 billion in annual spending, with the state contributing about $1.5 billion, according to federal data. Democratic Gov. Janet Mills has pushed back on the claims, referring to CMS Director Mehmet Oz as a "former TV doctor" and accusing the Trump administration of using the allegations of fraud to "punish" Democratic-led states. She notes that MaineCare's improper payment error rate is 2.4%, which is less than half the national average. Vice President JD Vance accused "illegal aliens" of stealing millions of dollars in federal funding from Maine taxpayers during a visit to the state in May, where he announced that the Trump administration is freezing new Medicare enrollments for hospice and home health agencies for the next six months for all states, including Maine. Vance said the move is aimed at protecting people who depend on Medicare and taxpayers.
24 minutes
Gravado em 72 horas durante o festival de 2025, o filme da cineasta Ana Lígia Pimentel coloca os torcedores no centro da história O post Documentário sobre as galeras de Parintins estreia no Bumbódromo nesta sexta apareceu primeiro em Mídia NINJA.
Gravado em 72 horas durante o festival de 2025, o filme da cineasta Ana Lígia Pimentel coloca os torcedores no centro da história O post Documentário sobre as galeras de Parintins estreia no Bumbódromo nesta sexta apareceu primeiro em Mídia NINJA.
25 minutes
'เครือข่ายปราจีนเข้มแข็ง' ยื่นหนังสือคัดค้านขยายพื้นที่ EEC มาที่ปราจึนบุรี กังวลเพิ่มผลกระทบทางด้านมลพิษ กระทบวิถีชีวิตการเกษตร ขาดความเชื่อใจรัฐในการแก้ไขปัญหาด้านสิ่งแวดล้อม ด้านบูรณะนิเวศ ตั้งคำถามถึง 'ก่อกิจ' รองเลขาฯ EEC โพสต์เฟซบุ๊ก เล่นมุกหลอกด่าชาวบ้านจากจังหวัดปราจีนบุรีที่มายื่นหนังสือคัดค้าน EEC ว่าเป็น 'ควาย' ?
'เครือข่ายปราจีนเข้มแข็ง' ยื่นหนังสือคัดค้านขยายพื้นที่ EEC มาที่ปราจึนบุรี กังวลเพิ่มผลกระทบทางด้านมลพิษ กระทบวิถีชีวิตการเกษตร ขาดความเชื่อใจรัฐในการแก้ไขปัญหาด้านสิ่งแวดล้อม ด้านบูรณะนิเวศ ตั้งคำถามถึง 'ก่อกิจ' รองเลขาฯ EEC โพสต์เฟซบุ๊ก เล่นมุกหลอกด่าชาวบ้านจากจังหวัดปราจีนบุรีที่มายื่นหนังสือคัดค้าน EEC ว่าเป็น 'ควาย' ?
26 minutes
(The Center Square) – The Republican head of a powerful U.S. Senate committee has subpoenaed Dr. Anthony Fauci, demanding the former chief medical advisor testify before lawmakers about his response to the COVID-19 pandemic. “For six months, I have been negotiating with Anthony Fauci's lawyers over a date to testify before my Homeland Security Committee. He finally agreed to appear this month. Then he backed out. So I subpoenaed him,” Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Rand Paul, R-Ky., posted on social media Tuesday. “He will testify in July.” In a separate post, Paul outlined some of the questions he intends to ask Fauci, who headed the nation’s pandemic response. “Did Dr. Fauci fund gain-of-function research while telling Congress he didn't? Why were records destroyed? And why did he need a presidential pardon? The American people deserve answers, and I am going to make sure they get them during our hearing next month,” Paul said. Fauci, who received a preemptive pardon from former President Joe Biden, has faced criticism over his handling of the pandemic response. Paul and other Republicans have accused Fauci of covering up the true origins of the virus after a National Institutes of Health official revealed in 2024 that U.S. taxpayer dollars had indeed funded what many would term “gain of function” research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the area where the virus was first discovered. The admission contradicted Fauci’s assertion to Congress in 2021, under oath, that the “NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” a statement Republicans considered intentionally misleading. Paul’s subpoena Monday came just days after former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified hundreds of documents, which she claims “expose Fauci’s direct role in influencing and manipulating IC assessments on COVID-19.” Among other records, Gabbard declassified the U.S. taxpayer-funded research on coronaviruses, which analyzed the risks of coronavirus spreading from bats to humans, that NIH had admitted to funding. The controversy-ridden nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance conducted those studies, some of which dated back to 2014. During the pandemic, Fauci repeatedly discouraged the idea that the virus originated from a lab. But the other documents Gabbard declassified, which largely consist of email exchanges between federal health and IC officials, fall short of proving that he “worked with politicized career leadership in the Intelligence Community (IC) to suppress the truth about his actions” and the lab leak theory. The declassified information shows Fauci was included in the communications between federal health agencies and the Intelligence Community, both involved with pandemic research and response and both attempting to clear up conflicting information. Per the emails, Fauci often advised IC officials – who specifically asked health officials for advice and clarification on how to interpret virus-related research and other theories – and recommended they consult certain health experts for additional information. He also provided his opinion that the virus was zoonotic in origin when asked. Most health officials in the emails, whose names were largely redacted, emphasized caution related to assertions that the virus was created in a lab. One email written by an IC official read "Hi team – Is anyone looking at the open source report that a Chinese virologist claims to have proof that COVID-19 was made in a Wuhan lab? We’re getting questions from our leadership and I figured those with more technical expertise probably have already evaluated this report." A recipient – presumably from the NIH, but both the name and office of the respondent are redacted – informed the IC official that the study in question had numerous errors and was published by a pair of nonprofit groups, which had never before released any medical research, linked to political strategist Steve Bannon. Some of the health officials acknowledged that coronaviruses were likely studied in the WIV lab. They also confirmed that a lab analysis found that "all of the necessary conditions for an accidental release of a laboratory-modified coronavirus — specifically a coronavirus adapted to recognize human cell receptors" were present at the WIV in 2019. However, they pointed out to IC officials that the authors of the report determined the findings "place equal weight on the hypothesis" of an accidental lab leak versus the virus emerging naturally in Wuhan. "I've been tracking this pretty closely in the literature, and would advise to set a very high threshold for any GOF [gain of function] interpretation as an origin of SAR COV-2,” a health official whose name is redacted said. “Not saying it is impossible, but I think Occam's razor is the best guidance here. [...] To be honest - I cannot imagine the Chinese NOT doing this type of research, but an escaped P3+/P4 LAI would be extraordinary.” While the origins of the virus still remain under debate, the White House has officially endorsed the lab leak theory.
(The Center Square) – The Republican head of a powerful U.S. Senate committee has subpoenaed Dr. Anthony Fauci, demanding the former chief medical advisor testify before lawmakers about his response to the COVID-19 pandemic. “For six months, I have been negotiating with Anthony Fauci's lawyers over a date to testify before my Homeland Security Committee. He finally agreed to appear this month. Then he backed out. So I subpoenaed him,” Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee Chairman Rand Paul, R-Ky., posted on social media Tuesday. “He will testify in July.” In a separate post, Paul outlined some of the questions he intends to ask Fauci, who headed the nation’s pandemic response. “Did Dr. Fauci fund gain-of-function research while telling Congress he didn't? Why were records destroyed? And why did he need a presidential pardon? The American people deserve answers, and I am going to make sure they get them during our hearing next month,” Paul said. Fauci, who received a preemptive pardon from former President Joe Biden, has faced criticism over his handling of the pandemic response. Paul and other Republicans have accused Fauci of covering up the true origins of the virus after a National Institutes of Health official revealed in 2024 that U.S. taxpayer dollars had indeed funded what many would term “gain of function” research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in the area where the virus was first discovered. The admission contradicted Fauci’s assertion to Congress in 2021, under oath, that the “NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” a statement Republicans considered intentionally misleading. Paul’s subpoena Monday came just days after former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified hundreds of documents, which she claims “expose Fauci’s direct role in influencing and manipulating IC assessments on COVID-19.” Among other records, Gabbard declassified the U.S. taxpayer-funded research on coronaviruses, which analyzed the risks of coronavirus spreading from bats to humans, that NIH had admitted to funding. The controversy-ridden nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance conducted those studies, some of which dated back to 2014. During the pandemic, Fauci repeatedly discouraged the idea that the virus originated from a lab. But the other documents Gabbard declassified, which largely consist of email exchanges between federal health and IC officials, fall short of proving that he “worked with politicized career leadership in the Intelligence Community (IC) to suppress the truth about his actions” and the lab leak theory. The declassified information shows Fauci was included in the communications between federal health agencies and the Intelligence Community, both involved with pandemic research and response and both attempting to clear up conflicting information. Per the emails, Fauci often advised IC officials – who specifically asked health officials for advice and clarification on how to interpret virus-related research and other theories – and recommended they consult certain health experts for additional information. He also provided his opinion that the virus was zoonotic in origin when asked. Most health officials in the emails, whose names were largely redacted, emphasized caution related to assertions that the virus was created in a lab. One email written by an IC official read "Hi team – Is anyone looking at the open source report that a Chinese virologist claims to have proof that COVID-19 was made in a Wuhan lab? We’re getting questions from our leadership and I figured those with more technical expertise probably have already evaluated this report." A recipient – presumably from the NIH, but both the name and office of the respondent are redacted – informed the IC official that the study in question had numerous errors and was published by a pair of nonprofit groups, which had never before released any medical research, linked to political strategist Steve Bannon. Some of the health officials acknowledged that coronaviruses were likely studied in the WIV lab. They also confirmed that a lab analysis found that "all of the necessary conditions for an accidental release of a laboratory-modified coronavirus — specifically a coronavirus adapted to recognize human cell receptors" were present at the WIV in 2019. However, they pointed out to IC officials that the authors of the report determined the findings "place equal weight on the hypothesis" of an accidental lab leak versus the virus emerging naturally in Wuhan. "I've been tracking this pretty closely in the literature, and would advise to set a very high threshold for any GOF [gain of function] interpretation as an origin of SAR COV-2,” a health official whose name is redacted said. “Not saying it is impossible, but I think Occam's razor is the best guidance here. [...] To be honest - I cannot imagine the Chinese NOT doing this type of research, but an escaped P3+/P4 LAI would be extraordinary.” While the origins of the virus still remain under debate, the White House has officially endorsed the lab leak theory.
27 minutes
မြန်မာဒုက္ခသည်တွေကို ပန်းရောင်ကတ်တွေ ထိုင်းထုတ်ပေးတဲ့အကြောင်းနဲ့ ထူးခြားတဲ့ သတင်းတွေကို တင်ပြထားပါတယ်။
မြန်မာဒုက္ခသည်တွေကို ပန်းရောင်ကတ်တွေ ထိုင်းထုတ်ပေးတဲ့အကြောင်းနဲ့ ထူးခြားတဲ့ သတင်းတွေကို တင်ပြထားပါတယ်။
27 minutes
Венгрия выступила против отправки в адрес Европейского совета и Еврокомиссии письма с общей позицией всех 27 стран ЕС по вопросу вступления Украины и Молдовы в блок, пишет Politico со ссылкой на два источника.
Венгрия выступила против отправки в адрес Европейского совета и Еврокомиссии письма с общей позицией всех 27 стран ЕС по вопросу вступления Украины и Молдовы в блок, пишет Politico со ссылкой на два источника.
27 minutes
(The Center Square) - Many Americans do not think there is enough government regulation of artificial intelligence, according to a new poll. The Center Square’s Voters Voice Poll, conducted by Noble Predictive Insights, found that 45% of registered voters said there is “too little” government regulation of AI. Only 13% of voters said there was “too much” government regulation of AI and 23% said there was “about the right amount” of government regulation in AI. The poll, conducted from June 1-4, surveyed 2,585 respondents. The sample included 915 Republicans, 1,013 Democrats and 297 true independents, which are individuals who do not lean toward either major party when asked. As AI companies race to expand data centers across the country, many elected leaders and taxpayers have spoken out. Residents living near data centers have complained of energy problems, lack of water access, and noise pollution. Across partisan lines, there was a significant difference among Democrats and Republicans. About 37% of respondents who identified themselves as Republicans said there was “too little” government regulation of AI, compared to 53% of Democratic respondents who said the same. About 41% of true independent respondents said there was “too little” government regulation of AI. Older respondents were more likely to believe there is “too little” government regulation of AI. About 55% of respondents older than 65 agreed with the statement, compared to 37% of those ages 18-29 who said the same. Mike Noble, founder of Noble Predictive Insights, said greater exposure to technology likely explains the difference among various age groups. “It’s a classic thing of generational differences,” Noble said. “There’s a big gap between the two on their technological experience.” Across racial backgrounds, white respondents were more likely to believe there was “too little” government regulation of AI. About 50% of white respondents believed there was “too little” regulation of AI, compared to 39% of Hispanics or Latinos and 30% of Black respondents who said the same. Overall, 18% of respondents said they were “not sure” whether there was too much, too little or the right amount of government regulation of AI. The amount of individuals who were unsure exceeded categories in many other questions. “There is a higher unsure rate compared to many of our other questions,” Noble said. “It’s a novelty among the electorate and many people haven’t made up their minds about it.” Female respondents were more likely than any other demographic group to be unsure about their stance on government regulation of AI, at 23%. “Government regulation needs to catch up to this new, fast, expanding technology,” Noble said.
(The Center Square) - Many Americans do not think there is enough government regulation of artificial intelligence, according to a new poll. The Center Square’s Voters Voice Poll, conducted by Noble Predictive Insights, found that 45% of registered voters said there is “too little” government regulation of AI. Only 13% of voters said there was “too much” government regulation of AI and 23% said there was “about the right amount” of government regulation in AI. The poll, conducted from June 1-4, surveyed 2,585 respondents. The sample included 915 Republicans, 1,013 Democrats and 297 true independents, which are individuals who do not lean toward either major party when asked. As AI companies race to expand data centers across the country, many elected leaders and taxpayers have spoken out. Residents living near data centers have complained of energy problems, lack of water access, and noise pollution. Across partisan lines, there was a significant difference among Democrats and Republicans. About 37% of respondents who identified themselves as Republicans said there was “too little” government regulation of AI, compared to 53% of Democratic respondents who said the same. About 41% of true independent respondents said there was “too little” government regulation of AI. Older respondents were more likely to believe there is “too little” government regulation of AI. About 55% of respondents older than 65 agreed with the statement, compared to 37% of those ages 18-29 who said the same. Mike Noble, founder of Noble Predictive Insights, said greater exposure to technology likely explains the difference among various age groups. “It’s a classic thing of generational differences,” Noble said. “There’s a big gap between the two on their technological experience.” Across racial backgrounds, white respondents were more likely to believe there was “too little” government regulation of AI. About 50% of white respondents believed there was “too little” regulation of AI, compared to 39% of Hispanics or Latinos and 30% of Black respondents who said the same. Overall, 18% of respondents said they were “not sure” whether there was too much, too little or the right amount of government regulation of AI. The amount of individuals who were unsure exceeded categories in many other questions. “There is a higher unsure rate compared to many of our other questions,” Noble said. “It’s a novelty among the electorate and many people haven’t made up their minds about it.” Female respondents were more likely than any other demographic group to be unsure about their stance on government regulation of AI, at 23%. “Government regulation needs to catch up to this new, fast, expanding technology,” Noble said.
28 minutes
Recent policy changes mean that treatment for addiction is becoming less accessible to those who are incarcerated. The post In prison, toxic drug deaths are rising. Access to treatment is shrinking appeared first on rabble.ca.
Recent policy changes mean that treatment for addiction is becoming less accessible to those who are incarcerated. The post In prison, toxic drug deaths are rising. Access to treatment is shrinking appeared first on rabble.ca.
28 minutes

Donald Trump and his MAGA allies are preparing for the transition to autocracy. Part of that plan includes billions in ICE funding.

Donald Trump and his MAGA allies are preparing for the transition to autocracy. Part of that plan includes billions in ICE funding.