7 minutes
বুম বাংলাদেশ দেখেছে, ২০২৩ সালে বেলজিউয়ামের ব্রাসেলসে গ্লোবাল গেটওয়ে ফোরাম নামে একটি কনফারেন্সে যোগদানকালে শেখ হাসিনার আলোচ্য ভিডিওটি ধারণ করা হয়।
বুম বাংলাদেশ দেখেছে, ২০২৩ সালে বেলজিউয়ামের ব্রাসেলসে গ্লোবাল গেটওয়ে ফোরাম নামে একটি কনফারেন্সে যোগদানকালে শেখ হাসিনার আলোচ্য ভিডিওটি ধারণ করা হয়।
10 minutes
O juiz Emílio Guimarães Moura Neto, da 1ª Vara Cível, Criminal e de Execuções Criminais de Araçuaí, acolheu integralmente os pedidos do Ministério Público de Minas Gerais (MPMG) sobre a readequação do acesso viário e a auditoria técnica independente. A decisão foi assinada na segunda-feira (28). O magistrado reconheceu o descumprimento da liminar e determinou […] Fonte
O juiz Emílio Guimarães Moura Neto, da 1ª Vara Cível, Criminal e de Execuções Criminais de Araçuaí, acolheu integralmente os pedidos do Ministério Público de Minas Gerais (MPMG) sobre a readequação do acesso viário e a auditoria técnica independente. A decisão foi assinada na segunda-feira (28). O magistrado reconheceu o descumprimento da liminar e determinou […] Fonte
10 minutes

Seniors and former staff say the Tech Connect program was temporarily eliminated in late August. They’re raising concerns about the shutdown of the program and asking for guidance for seniors who still need technology resources. The post Disconnected: Terminated staff and former patrons left with concerns after abrupt shutdown of tech-training program for seniors appeared first on Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service.

Seniors and former staff say the Tech Connect program was temporarily eliminated in late August. They’re raising concerns about the shutdown of the program and asking for guidance for seniors who still need technology resources. The post Disconnected: Terminated staff and former patrons left with concerns after abrupt shutdown of tech-training program for seniors appeared first on Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service.
10 minutes
(The Center Square) - More than 100 Puget Sound Energy ratepayers packed a four-hour public hearing in Lacey Tuesday night to urge members of the Utilities and Transportation Commission to reject PSE’s proposed rate hikes for electricity and natural gas. PSE is asking for a 15% increase in electricity and 14% for natural gas next year. Rates would climb again in 2028 and 2029, adding hundreds of dollars a year to power bills. In all, it amounts to $1.5 billion in rate increases over the next three years, which would cost a typical PSE electricity customer an additional $612 a year by 2029 and a typical gas customer $276 more a year. The for-profit utility says the increase is needed to build more power plants as demand increases and as the state cleans up its power supply to comply with clean energy mandates passed by majority Democrats. "The rate plan reflects the substantial capital investments PSE must make to continue delivering safe and reliable natural gas and electric service to customers, ensure sufficient capacity to meet growing energy demand, and continue making progress toward Washington state’s clean energy requirements," according to a PSE's website. The utility further explained its reasons in an earlier release. “Any increase in monthly bills is difficult for the families and businesses we serve. We take that seriously,” said Mary Kipp, president & CEO of Puget Sound Energy in a statement back in February when the utility announced the planned rate hikes. “At the same time, our customers count on us for safe, reliable energy, and many expect that energy to become cleaner in line with Washington’s climate laws. This rate plan reflects the balance we must strike: keeping our gas and electric system strong and dependable, investing in cleaner resources that will power our future, and doing so as responsibly and thoughtfully as possible,” said Kipp. Ratepayers lined up well before the meeting started Tuesday evening for a chance to urge commissioners not to allow PSE to raise rates so high. “The owners of Puget Sound Energy are treating the utility company as if it was an annuity. And the investors want a guaranteed 10% rate of return on their so-called investment," said Edgewood resident Andrew Wiesenfeld who spoke during public comment. "Now, everyone in this room would love to have an annuity with that kind of ROI. And even better, they would love to have someone else pay for it. That's exactly what PSE is seeking." “They want the ratepayers to pay the cost of PSE’s guaranteed stream of income. This strikes me as some kind of weird Orwellian, perverse, corporate socialism. Where the costs are socialized across the ratepayer base and the gains are individualized to the investors,” said Wiesenfeld. Mat Jackmond of Tumwater also testified in opposition to the PSE rate hikes. “I've been a PSE customer for over 45 years, and over the last three years, I've seen nothing but very large rate increases by PSE that are not what I would consider appropriate,” said Jackmond. He told the UTC his lowest PSE bill this year so far has been $403.50. “Last year, my lowest bill was $329.36. The year before that, my lowest bill was $276. Over the last 12 months, the rate increase for my power has been 19.21% higher than it was the year before…..this is exorbitant from a power company.” Jackmond referenced ties to PSE’s obligation to comply with the Climate Commitment Act and clean climate goals behind the rate hikes. “But how are retired folks like myself and others supposed to deal with this on fixed incomes?” In a Wednesday email to The Center Square, PSE conceded that meeting Washington state's clean energy requirements is one of the primary drivers behind recent rate increases. “Since the Clean Energy Transformation Act (CETA) was passed in 2019, the cost of acquiring all of the power needed to serve customers has more than tripled, going from about $750 million per year to more than $2 billion per year,” wrote PSE Media Engagement Program Manager Gerald Tracy. “In addition to those rising power costs, we estimate that complying with CETA has added approximately $820 million in costs—that figure does not include additional expenses needed [to] replace the energy we lost when coal was removed from our portfolio in compliance with state law. This is by far the biggest cause of higher costs for our customers.” State Attorney General Nick Brown has also pushed back against the PSE rate hike proposal, arguing PSE should absorb more of its own costs instead of passing them on to customers.“In 2025, PSE paid $62.9 million in dividends to their shareholders. In 2024, it was an eye-popping $175.9 million in dividends. On average, 12% of customers’ electric bills and 11% of their gas bills go to paying investors rather than for services," Brown wrote in a July press release.“PSE also spends customer money on projects that are not related to providing services. The AG’s office argues that spending on these items should come out of the pot of money PSE uses to pay shareholder dividends, rather than money customers pay as part of their electric and gas rates.”UTC members will make the final decision on whether to approve the rate hike request. That decision is expected in January, the same month power bills would be hit with the first spike.A virtual public comment hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, October 7, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. via Zoom or phone (253-215-8782, Meeting ID: 822 1351 8474#, Passcode: 226995#).Comments can also be submitted by phone at 888-333-9882, by email at comments@utc.wa.gov, by mail to P.O. Box 47250, Olympia, WA 98504-7250, or through the UTC Online Comment Form.
(The Center Square) - More than 100 Puget Sound Energy ratepayers packed a four-hour public hearing in Lacey Tuesday night to urge members of the Utilities and Transportation Commission to reject PSE’s proposed rate hikes for electricity and natural gas. PSE is asking for a 15% increase in electricity and 14% for natural gas next year. Rates would climb again in 2028 and 2029, adding hundreds of dollars a year to power bills. In all, it amounts to $1.5 billion in rate increases over the next three years, which would cost a typical PSE electricity customer an additional $612 a year by 2029 and a typical gas customer $276 more a year. The for-profit utility says the increase is needed to build more power plants as demand increases and as the state cleans up its power supply to comply with clean energy mandates passed by majority Democrats. "The rate plan reflects the substantial capital investments PSE must make to continue delivering safe and reliable natural gas and electric service to customers, ensure sufficient capacity to meet growing energy demand, and continue making progress toward Washington state’s clean energy requirements," according to a PSE's website. The utility further explained its reasons in an earlier release. “Any increase in monthly bills is difficult for the families and businesses we serve. We take that seriously,” said Mary Kipp, president & CEO of Puget Sound Energy in a statement back in February when the utility announced the planned rate hikes. “At the same time, our customers count on us for safe, reliable energy, and many expect that energy to become cleaner in line with Washington’s climate laws. This rate plan reflects the balance we must strike: keeping our gas and electric system strong and dependable, investing in cleaner resources that will power our future, and doing so as responsibly and thoughtfully as possible,” said Kipp. Ratepayers lined up well before the meeting started Tuesday evening for a chance to urge commissioners not to allow PSE to raise rates so high. “The owners of Puget Sound Energy are treating the utility company as if it was an annuity. And the investors want a guaranteed 10% rate of return on their so-called investment," said Edgewood resident Andrew Wiesenfeld who spoke during public comment. "Now, everyone in this room would love to have an annuity with that kind of ROI. And even better, they would love to have someone else pay for it. That's exactly what PSE is seeking." “They want the ratepayers to pay the cost of PSE’s guaranteed stream of income. This strikes me as some kind of weird Orwellian, perverse, corporate socialism. Where the costs are socialized across the ratepayer base and the gains are individualized to the investors,” said Wiesenfeld. Mat Jackmond of Tumwater also testified in opposition to the PSE rate hikes. “I've been a PSE customer for over 45 years, and over the last three years, I've seen nothing but very large rate increases by PSE that are not what I would consider appropriate,” said Jackmond. He told the UTC his lowest PSE bill this year so far has been $403.50. “Last year, my lowest bill was $329.36. The year before that, my lowest bill was $276. Over the last 12 months, the rate increase for my power has been 19.21% higher than it was the year before…..this is exorbitant from a power company.” Jackmond referenced ties to PSE’s obligation to comply with the Climate Commitment Act and clean climate goals behind the rate hikes. “But how are retired folks like myself and others supposed to deal with this on fixed incomes?” In a Wednesday email to The Center Square, PSE conceded that meeting Washington state's clean energy requirements is one of the primary drivers behind recent rate increases. “Since the Clean Energy Transformation Act (CETA) was passed in 2019, the cost of acquiring all of the power needed to serve customers has more than tripled, going from about $750 million per year to more than $2 billion per year,” wrote PSE Media Engagement Program Manager Gerald Tracy. “In addition to those rising power costs, we estimate that complying with CETA has added approximately $820 million in costs—that figure does not include additional expenses needed [to] replace the energy we lost when coal was removed from our portfolio in compliance with state law. This is by far the biggest cause of higher costs for our customers.” State Attorney General Nick Brown has also pushed back against the PSE rate hike proposal, arguing PSE should absorb more of its own costs instead of passing them on to customers.“In 2025, PSE paid $62.9 million in dividends to their shareholders. In 2024, it was an eye-popping $175.9 million in dividends. On average, 12% of customers’ electric bills and 11% of their gas bills go to paying investors rather than for services," Brown wrote in a July press release.“PSE also spends customer money on projects that are not related to providing services. The AG’s office argues that spending on these items should come out of the pot of money PSE uses to pay shareholder dividends, rather than money customers pay as part of their electric and gas rates.”UTC members will make the final decision on whether to approve the rate hike request. That decision is expected in January, the same month power bills would be hit with the first spike.A virtual public comment hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, October 7, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. via Zoom or phone (253-215-8782, Meeting ID: 822 1351 8474#, Passcode: 226995#).Comments can also be submitted by phone at 888-333-9882, by email at comments@utc.wa.gov, by mail to P.O. Box 47250, Olympia, WA 98504-7250, or through the UTC Online Comment Form.
10 minutes
Enquanto setores da esquerda ainda apostam no produtivismo, outros enveredam por um repúdio quase malthusiano à técnica. Há alternativa: resgatar das mãos do capital as novas tecnologias e empregá-las para o bem-estar das maiorias e a regeneração da natureza The post Por um Ecossocialismo de Abundância appeared first on Outras Palavras.
10 minutes
Enquanto setores da esquerda ainda apostam no produtivismo, outros enveredam por um repúdio quase malthusiano à técnica. Há alternativa: resgatar das mãos do capital as novas tecnologias e empregá-las para o bem-estar das maiorias e a regeneração da natureza The post Por um Ecossocialismo de Abundância appeared first on Outras Palavras.
13 minutes
বুম বাংলাদেশ দেখেছে, দাবিটি সঠিক নয়। এটি ভারতের উত্তরপ্রদেশে গত ৬ মে রাতে ৪৫ বছর বয়সী অনিতা দেবী নামের এক নারীর ব্যাগ ছিনতাইয়ের চেষ্টার ভিডিও।
বুম বাংলাদেশ দেখেছে, দাবিটি সঠিক নয়। এটি ভারতের উত্তরপ্রদেশে গত ৬ মে রাতে ৪৫ বছর বয়সী অনিতা দেবী নামের এক নারীর ব্যাগ ছিনতাইয়ের চেষ্টার ভিডিও।
15 minutes
(The Center Square) - Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser is suing the federal government as part of a second legal battle against the construction of immigrant detention centers in the state. The lawsuit was filed in an attempt to stop or temporarily delay the construction of a detention facility housing illegal immigrants in Hudson, Colo. Filed Tuesday by Weiser, the suit requested a preliminary injunction to “halt the continued renovation, construction, and planned operation of a new civil immigration detention center in Hudson, Colorado,” according to the court document. According to Weiser, the basis of the request for preliminary injunction falls on the grounds that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement must comply with an environmental review before proceeding, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act. “DHS and ICE have violated NEPA by contracting for the facility’s operation without considering the potential environmental impacts,” the document further reads. DHS and ICE did not immediately respond to The Center Square's request for comment on the lawsuit. Weiser previously sued the private prison company, GEO Group, in August, in an effort to require the company to comply with state health and safety inspections. GEO Group currently owns and operates an immigration detention facility in another Colorado city, Aurora. This came as a tuberculosis outbreak was reported at the prison, to which the county and state’s department for public safety and environment issued an order requesting the facility also comply with the state’s investigative procedures. GEO Group initially sued the state merely weeks before Attorney General Weiser filed his lawsuit against the private company. The company alleged the state could not implement or enforce statewide health and safety inspections because of the federal contract GEO group has with the government, which would effectively bar the state from enforcing regulations over the federal government’s orders. Weiser released a press statement on Tuesday for the newest lawsuit, saying “Coloradans are deeply worried about plans to open a new immigrant detention facility in Hudson to carry out the Trump administration’s inhumane — and often illegal — mass deportation scheme.” Weiser’s chief communications officer, Lawrence Pacheco, declined to provide any additional comments to The Center Square. The press release added that the federal government had complied with the federal law’s requirements previously and conducted an environmental review for immigration detention facilities in Texas. He indicated that Colorado’s situation should be no different. “We’re asking the court to stop any further activities to open and operate the Hudson site until DHS and ICE conduct the legal analysis required by law,” Weiser said in his statement. Weiser’s earlier lawsuit against GEO Group did not end in his favor, however, as a Trump-appointed federal judge ruled against the state. The judge effectively blocked major provisions in Colorado’s House Bill 26-1276 by citing the federal supremacy clause, which means federal legislation trumps state legislation, and the state could not require a federally-funded facility to comply with state-mandated orders over the federal government. This would be Weiser’s 84th lawsuit against the second Trump administration. The Democratic attorney general, who's running against Republican candidate Victor Marx for governor, tracks the status of his lawsuits on the Attorney General Office’s website, in a section called “Defending Colorado.”
(The Center Square) - Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser is suing the federal government as part of a second legal battle against the construction of immigrant detention centers in the state. The lawsuit was filed in an attempt to stop or temporarily delay the construction of a detention facility housing illegal immigrants in Hudson, Colo. Filed Tuesday by Weiser, the suit requested a preliminary injunction to “halt the continued renovation, construction, and planned operation of a new civil immigration detention center in Hudson, Colorado,” according to the court document. According to Weiser, the basis of the request for preliminary injunction falls on the grounds that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement must comply with an environmental review before proceeding, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act. “DHS and ICE have violated NEPA by contracting for the facility’s operation without considering the potential environmental impacts,” the document further reads. DHS and ICE did not immediately respond to The Center Square's request for comment on the lawsuit. Weiser previously sued the private prison company, GEO Group, in August, in an effort to require the company to comply with state health and safety inspections. GEO Group currently owns and operates an immigration detention facility in another Colorado city, Aurora. This came as a tuberculosis outbreak was reported at the prison, to which the county and state’s department for public safety and environment issued an order requesting the facility also comply with the state’s investigative procedures. GEO Group initially sued the state merely weeks before Attorney General Weiser filed his lawsuit against the private company. The company alleged the state could not implement or enforce statewide health and safety inspections because of the federal contract GEO group has with the government, which would effectively bar the state from enforcing regulations over the federal government’s orders. Weiser released a press statement on Tuesday for the newest lawsuit, saying “Coloradans are deeply worried about plans to open a new immigrant detention facility in Hudson to carry out the Trump administration’s inhumane — and often illegal — mass deportation scheme.” Weiser’s chief communications officer, Lawrence Pacheco, declined to provide any additional comments to The Center Square. The press release added that the federal government had complied with the federal law’s requirements previously and conducted an environmental review for immigration detention facilities in Texas. He indicated that Colorado’s situation should be no different. “We’re asking the court to stop any further activities to open and operate the Hudson site until DHS and ICE conduct the legal analysis required by law,” Weiser said in his statement. Weiser’s earlier lawsuit against GEO Group did not end in his favor, however, as a Trump-appointed federal judge ruled against the state. The judge effectively blocked major provisions in Colorado’s House Bill 26-1276 by citing the federal supremacy clause, which means federal legislation trumps state legislation, and the state could not require a federally-funded facility to comply with state-mandated orders over the federal government. This would be Weiser’s 84th lawsuit against the second Trump administration. The Democratic attorney general, who's running against Republican candidate Victor Marx for governor, tracks the status of his lawsuits on the Attorney General Office’s website, in a section called “Defending Colorado.”
15 minutes
Военные расходы останутся одним из главных приоритетов
Военные расходы останутся одним из главных приоритетов
15 minutes
Военные расходы останутся одним из главных приоритетов
Военные расходы останутся одним из главных приоритетов
15 minutes
Военные расходы останутся одним из главных приоритетов
Военные расходы останутся одним из главных приоритетов
15 minutes
Военные расходы останутся одним из главных приоритетов
Военные расходы останутся одним из главных приоритетов
17 minutes
বুম বাংলাদেশ দেখেছে, দাবিটি সঠিক নয়। ভিডিওর ব্যক্তি একজন মধ্যবয়সী; আর মোহাম্মদ আলী জিন্নাহ মারা গেছেন ১৯৪৮ সালে যখন জিয়াউর রহমানের বয়স ছিলো ১১ বা সর্বোচ্চ ১২ বছর।
বুম বাংলাদেশ দেখেছে, দাবিটি সঠিক নয়। ভিডিওর ব্যক্তি একজন মধ্যবয়সী; আর মোহাম্মদ আলী জিন্নাহ মারা গেছেন ১৯৪৮ সালে যখন জিয়াউর রহমানের বয়স ছিলো ১১ বা সর্বোচ্চ ১২ বছর।
17 minutes
The Maine Senate returned for a one-day session Wednesday to confirm more than 40 nominees to assorted state positions. Senators unanimously confirmed Gerald Reid as a Maine Superior Court justice. Reid previously served as the commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, and before that served in the Maine Attorney General’s Office Natural Resources […]
The Maine Senate returned for a one-day session Wednesday to confirm more than 40 nominees to assorted state positions. Senators unanimously confirmed Gerald Reid as a Maine Superior Court justice. Reid previously served as the commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental Protection, and before that served in the Maine Attorney General’s Office Natural Resources […]
18 minutes
Daniel’s Law allows judges and cops in New Jersey to shield their personal information from public disclosure. A new bill would make out-of-state officials eligible.
Daniel’s Law allows judges and cops in New Jersey to shield their personal information from public disclosure. A new bill would make out-of-state officials eligible.
19 minutes
Ohio state lawmakers have approved a 90-day gas tax holiday at the urging of Republican candidate for governor Vivek Ramaswamy. The House and Senate also cobbled together the two-thirds supermajority necessary for an emergency clause which ensures the measure takes effect immediately. The move comes as the rising cost of gas and diesel threaten Republicans’ […]
Ohio state lawmakers have approved a 90-day gas tax holiday at the urging of Republican candidate for governor Vivek Ramaswamy. The House and Senate also cobbled together the two-thirds supermajority necessary for an emergency clause which ensures the measure takes effect immediately. The move comes as the rising cost of gas and diesel threaten Republicans’ […]
20 minutes
Did you know search engines like Google are changing the way you see news? Keep Chalkbeat’s valuable education coverage at the top of your feeds by clicking here and checking the box next to our name.Tutoring. SAT prep. Summer camp. Field trips.These are just some of the things that education advocates hope to offer public school students through the federal scholarship tax credit, a major school choice expansion that has the potential to become the one of the largest sources of federal funding for schools. The list includes things that well-off families provide their own children as a matter of course, as well as things that public schools used to provide that now feel like luxuries. A small but growing set of organizations — school districts, charter schools, public school foundations, start-up nonprofits, and after-school providers — is working to turn a tax credit primarily designed to cover private school tuition into a benefit for public school students. The extent of their success could determine how many children are ultimately helped by the tax credit, and influence whether more Democratic governors in particular opt their states into the program.“Critics would say this wasn’t created for us,” said Sara Hazel, the president and CEO of the Denver Public Schools Foundation, which raises money for Colorado’s largest school district and hopes to use tax-credit dollars for tutoring and after-school scholarships. “I believe there’s money on the table, and public school students should benefit from that. That’s the bottom line of why we’re doing this.”Some are enthusiastic, like New York charter school leader Ian Rowe, who wants his students to have, yes, SAT prep, but also horizon-expanding experiences like going up in small planes with trained flight instructors to spark an interest in aviation and aerospace careers.Others are reluctant, like the Southern Education Foundation, whose leaders say they felt compelled to launch a tutoring-focused scholarship organization even though they oppose the policy on principle. And some ideas challenge traditional understandings of how public schools should operate. School finance expert Marguerite Roza says districts should create a fixed package of services and charge a hefty fee for what she calls the K12 Plus Plan. That fee would then be covered by scholarships. Treasury Department rules expected soon likely won’t answer all the outstanding questions about how this money can and can’t be used, which could complicate planning efforts.Skeptics say private schools, and in particular networks of religious schools, remain far better positioned to benefit from the tax credit. They also say the program is ripe for fraud and abuse, and that it will end up being profoundly regressive. In other words: Take the financial disparities in PTA fundraising, then add a few more zeroes.“This money will disproportionately flow to private school families, and to the extent it flows to public school families, it will disproportionately flow to better off families,” said Jon Valant, director of the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution, a think tank.Education tax credit could boost tutoring, enrichmentPassed last year as part of President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the federal scholarship tax credit goes into effect in 2027. The program reimburses taxpayers up to $1,700 for donations to scholarship-granting organizations, which in turn give the money to families for educational expenses, such as private school tuition, tutoring, or special needs services. The law provides a mechanism to expand private school choice in states without voucher programs. It also specifies traditional public school and charter school students can benefit. But what does it mean to provide a scholarship to a student in public school?Deb Gist saw district leaders struggle to take advantage of similar provisions in Oklahoma’s state education tax credit when she was superintendent of Tulsa Public Schools. Reading the federal law, Gist saw a chance for a do-over on a larger scale. “I immediately had my superintendent hat on and thought of all the things we could have funded with this,” she said. Gist launched Future School Fund as a scholarship-granting organization to help traditional public schools and charters pay for various enrichment and education services. Rowe, the New York charter leader and a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said a school’s role with the tax credits should be connecting families to trusted providers, such as a top SAT prep company that wants to work with talented students from low-income backgrounds. “It’s not just that there’s tutoring,” said Rowe. “It’s tutoring from a best-in-class partner that your school has built a trusted relationship with.”The Southern Education Foundation, which traces its roots back to post-Civil War efforts to educate formerly enslaved people, adamantly opposes the tax credit and supports efforts to repeal it. Yet after agonizing internal debate, the group decided to launch its own scholarship-granting organization. “We asked ourselves, ‘what do we do?’ Those 15 states educate roughly 20 million students, the majority of whom are low-income students and Black and brown students,” said Fred Jones, the foundation’s senior director of public policy and advocacy, referring to Southern states that have opted in. “How much can we redirect dollars in this ecosystem to ensure these students are best served?”Colorado Gov. Jared Polis has been a vocal supporter of the education tax credit, and his office has supported efforts to figure out how to use the money for public school students.Colorado, where Gov. Jared Polis is the lone Democratic governor to enthusiastically embrace the program, has emerged as a hot spot for organizing ways to use the tax credit. One possible use: fifth-day programming in the state’s roughly 130 school districts, most of them small and rural, that operate on four-day school weeks. Can the education tax credits prevent painful cuts?Some advocates say school districts should make the program what they need it to be. Roza, who heads the Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University, said her proposed K12 Plus Plan might cover what districts would have funded with federal pandemic aid, or activities covered by fees, or programs they might cut in a lean budget year — like tutoring, but also sports, arts education, and counseling. She acknowledges that using private donations reimbursed by the federal government to pay hefty student fees is “certainly a circuitous route to get money into school districts.” But she believes it is legal, and it doesn’t require asking voters for a tax increase or begging the state legislature for more money. Clark County Public Schools and the Public Education Foundation in Las Vegas are exploring this model. They hope to put together a package of services that local donors will find compelling.Not everyone loves the look, though. “We will never make up fees and then go pay for those fees with the scholarship,” said Shannon Hancock, chair of the Colorado School Foundations Association. “That’s so dishonest.”Public school efforts to capitalize on the tax credit led Daniel Buck, a research fellow at the American Research Institute, to worry the tax credit will end up funding “a glorified slush fund for public schools.” But private school choice groups like American Federation for Children and EdChoice — who have a vested interest in Democratic governors saying yes — have been bullish on the potential benefits to public schools.“Educational freedom isn’t private school choice,” said Jim Blew, who worked at the U.S. Department of Education in the first Trump administration and cofounded the conservative Defense of Freedom Institute. “It’s the ability to direct your child’s education.” Still, realizing the vision will require a massive marketing campaign and buy-in from large employers, who could facilitate payroll deductions. There are also questions about who will decide which students and districts get how much money when there isn’t enough to go around.Even with those challenges, Josh Cowen, an education researcher at Michigan State University and a prominent opponent of private school vouchers, finds himself unexpectedly optimistic.Similar to Roza, he believes schools can use the credit creatively, and that it will help shield them from the vagaries of federal and state budgets. “None of my state voucher critiques have changed,” he said. “This is a different policy.”Erica Meltzer is Chalkbeat’s national editor based in Colorado. Contact Erica at emeltzer@chalkbeat.org.Melanie Asmar is the bureau chief for Chalkbeat Colorado. Contact Melanie at masmar@chalkbeat.org.
20 minutes
Did you know search engines like Google are changing the way you see news? Keep Chalkbeat’s valuable education coverage at the top of your feeds by clicking here and checking the box next to our name.Tutoring. SAT prep. Summer camp. Field trips.These are just some of the things that education advocates hope to offer public school students through the federal scholarship tax credit, a major school choice expansion that has the potential to become the one of the largest sources of federal funding for schools. The list includes things that well-off families provide their own children as a matter of course, as well as things that public schools used to provide that now feel like luxuries. A small but growing set of organizations — school districts, charter schools, public school foundations, start-up nonprofits, and after-school providers — is working to turn a tax credit primarily designed to cover private school tuition into a benefit for public school students. The extent of their success could determine how many children are ultimately helped by the tax credit, and influence whether more Democratic governors in particular opt their states into the program.“Critics would say this wasn’t created for us,” said Sara Hazel, the president and CEO of the Denver Public Schools Foundation, which raises money for Colorado’s largest school district and hopes to use tax-credit dollars for tutoring and after-school scholarships. “I believe there’s money on the table, and public school students should benefit from that. That’s the bottom line of why we’re doing this.”Some are enthusiastic, like New York charter school leader Ian Rowe, who wants his students to have, yes, SAT prep, but also horizon-expanding experiences like going up in small planes with trained flight instructors to spark an interest in aviation and aerospace careers.Others are reluctant, like the Southern Education Foundation, whose leaders say they felt compelled to launch a tutoring-focused scholarship organization even though they oppose the policy on principle. And some ideas challenge traditional understandings of how public schools should operate. School finance expert Marguerite Roza says districts should create a fixed package of services and charge a hefty fee for what she calls the K12 Plus Plan. That fee would then be covered by scholarships. Treasury Department rules expected soon likely won’t answer all the outstanding questions about how this money can and can’t be used, which could complicate planning efforts.Skeptics say private schools, and in particular networks of religious schools, remain far better positioned to benefit from the tax credit. They also say the program is ripe for fraud and abuse, and that it will end up being profoundly regressive. In other words: Take the financial disparities in PTA fundraising, then add a few more zeroes.“This money will disproportionately flow to private school families, and to the extent it flows to public school families, it will disproportionately flow to better off families,” said Jon Valant, director of the Brown Center on Education Policy at the Brookings Institution, a think tank.Education tax credit could boost tutoring, enrichmentPassed last year as part of President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the federal scholarship tax credit goes into effect in 2027. The program reimburses taxpayers up to $1,700 for donations to scholarship-granting organizations, which in turn give the money to families for educational expenses, such as private school tuition, tutoring, or special needs services. The law provides a mechanism to expand private school choice in states without voucher programs. It also specifies traditional public school and charter school students can benefit. But what does it mean to provide a scholarship to a student in public school?Deb Gist saw district leaders struggle to take advantage of similar provisions in Oklahoma’s state education tax credit when she was superintendent of Tulsa Public Schools. Reading the federal law, Gist saw a chance for a do-over on a larger scale. “I immediately had my superintendent hat on and thought of all the things we could have funded with this,” she said. Gist launched Future School Fund as a scholarship-granting organization to help traditional public schools and charters pay for various enrichment and education services. Rowe, the New York charter leader and a senior fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, said a school’s role with the tax credits should be connecting families to trusted providers, such as a top SAT prep company that wants to work with talented students from low-income backgrounds. “It’s not just that there’s tutoring,” said Rowe. “It’s tutoring from a best-in-class partner that your school has built a trusted relationship with.”The Southern Education Foundation, which traces its roots back to post-Civil War efforts to educate formerly enslaved people, adamantly opposes the tax credit and supports efforts to repeal it. Yet after agonizing internal debate, the group decided to launch its own scholarship-granting organization. “We asked ourselves, ‘what do we do?’ Those 15 states educate roughly 20 million students, the majority of whom are low-income students and Black and brown students,” said Fred Jones, the foundation’s senior director of public policy and advocacy, referring to Southern states that have opted in. “How much can we redirect dollars in this ecosystem to ensure these students are best served?”Colorado Gov. Jared Polis has been a vocal supporter of the education tax credit, and his office has supported efforts to figure out how to use the money for public school students.Colorado, where Gov. Jared Polis is the lone Democratic governor to enthusiastically embrace the program, has emerged as a hot spot for organizing ways to use the tax credit. One possible use: fifth-day programming in the state’s roughly 130 school districts, most of them small and rural, that operate on four-day school weeks. Can the education tax credits prevent painful cuts?Some advocates say school districts should make the program what they need it to be. Roza, who heads the Edunomics Lab at Georgetown University, said her proposed K12 Plus Plan might cover what districts would have funded with federal pandemic aid, or activities covered by fees, or programs they might cut in a lean budget year — like tutoring, but also sports, arts education, and counseling. She acknowledges that using private donations reimbursed by the federal government to pay hefty student fees is “certainly a circuitous route to get money into school districts.” But she believes it is legal, and it doesn’t require asking voters for a tax increase or begging the state legislature for more money. Clark County Public Schools and the Public Education Foundation in Las Vegas are exploring this model. They hope to put together a package of services that local donors will find compelling.Not everyone loves the look, though. “We will never make up fees and then go pay for those fees with the scholarship,” said Shannon Hancock, chair of the Colorado School Foundations Association. “That’s so dishonest.”Public school efforts to capitalize on the tax credit led Daniel Buck, a research fellow at the American Research Institute, to worry the tax credit will end up funding “a glorified slush fund for public schools.” But private school choice groups like American Federation for Children and EdChoice — who have a vested interest in Democratic governors saying yes — have been bullish on the potential benefits to public schools.“Educational freedom isn’t private school choice,” said Jim Blew, who worked at the U.S. Department of Education in the first Trump administration and cofounded the conservative Defense of Freedom Institute. “It’s the ability to direct your child’s education.” Still, realizing the vision will require a massive marketing campaign and buy-in from large employers, who could facilitate payroll deductions. There are also questions about who will decide which students and districts get how much money when there isn’t enough to go around.Even with those challenges, Josh Cowen, an education researcher at Michigan State University and a prominent opponent of private school vouchers, finds himself unexpectedly optimistic.Similar to Roza, he believes schools can use the credit creatively, and that it will help shield them from the vagaries of federal and state budgets. “None of my state voucher critiques have changed,” he said. “This is a different policy.”Erica Meltzer is Chalkbeat’s national editor based in Colorado. Contact Erica at emeltzer@chalkbeat.org.Melanie Asmar is the bureau chief for Chalkbeat Colorado. Contact Melanie at masmar@chalkbeat.org.
21 minutes
Por Rachel Pereda, de El Toque, medio aliado de Factchequeado.Los votantes de Florida elegirán el próximo 3 de noviembre de 2026 a un nuevo gobernad...
21 minutes
Por Rachel Pereda, de El Toque, medio aliado de Factchequeado.Los votantes de Florida elegirán el próximo 3 de noviembre de 2026 a un nuevo gobernad...
21 minutes
The U.S. Supreme Court on April 9, 2026. (Photo by Ashley Murray/States Newsroom)]]>
The U.S. Supreme Court on April 9, 2026. (Photo by Ashley Murray/States Newsroom)]]>
22 minutes
বুম বাংলাদেশ দেখেছে, ২০১৯ সালের ৩০ সেপ্টেম্বর যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের নিউইয়র্কে জাতিসংঘে বাংলাদেশের স্থায়ী মিশনে শিশুদের সঙ্গে জন্মদিনের কেক কাটেন শেখ হাসিনা।
বুম বাংলাদেশ দেখেছে, ২০১৯ সালের ৩০ সেপ্টেম্বর যুক্তরাষ্ট্রের নিউইয়র্কে জাতিসংঘে বাংলাদেশের স্থায়ী মিশনে শিশুদের সঙ্গে জন্মদিনের কেক কাটেন শেখ হাসিনা।
23 minutes
بمشاركة قيادات حكومية وإنسانية وثقافية شبكة بيئة ابوظبي، دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة ، أبوظبي، 01 اكتوبر 2026 أعلنت جائزة زايد للأخوّة الإنسانية تشكيل لجنة تحكيم دورة عام 2027، التي تضم 5 أعضاء وتتضمن خبرات من إيطاليا والعراق ولبنان وكازخستان لأول مرة. وتشرف اللجنة الجديدة على اختيار الأفراد والمؤسسات من أي من الخلفيات والأمكنة في العالم … ظهرت المقالة جائزة زايد للأخوّة الإنسانية تعلن تشكيل لجنة التحكيم لعام 2027 أولاً على بيئة أبوظبي.
بمشاركة قيادات حكومية وإنسانية وثقافية شبكة بيئة ابوظبي، دولة الإمارات العربية المتحدة ، أبوظبي، 01 اكتوبر 2026 أعلنت جائزة زايد للأخوّة الإنسانية تشكيل لجنة تحكيم دورة عام 2027، التي تضم 5 أعضاء وتتضمن خبرات من إيطاليا والعراق ولبنان وكازخستان لأول مرة. وتشرف اللجنة الجديدة على اختيار الأفراد والمؤسسات من أي من الخلفيات والأمكنة في العالم … ظهرت المقالة جائزة زايد للأخوّة الإنسانية تعلن تشكيل لجنة التحكيم لعام 2027 أولاً على بيئة أبوظبي.