Open Newswire

Three Commissioner of Political Practices complaints filed against Accountability in State Government, a conservative political action committee, over mailers that used generative artificial intelligence will be dismissed, according to court records from an accompanying lawsuit in federal district court. Rep. Eric Albus, a Hi-Line Republican, former legislator Jennifer Carlson, running for a state House seat […]

میزان توان جمهوری اسلامی برای تحمل «عملیات طرد اقتصادی»؛ گفت‌وگو با جمشید اسدی

واکنش‌ها به پیروزی تاریخی عایشه وهاب؛ نخستین نماینده زن افغان‌تبار در کنگره آمریکا

انتصاب ناصر عتباتی به ریاست دادگستری تهران؛ نگرانی نهادهای حقوق بشری

The Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ) has joined 19 other states, including the commonwealths of Massachusetts and Virginia, in a lawsuit pushing back against the Trump administration’s attempts to attach immigration enforcement requirements to federal grants supporting state and local public safety efforts. “Threatening to cut funding that supports law enforcement if states don’t agree […]

(The Center Square) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday temporarily allowed the Trump administration to maintain an order placing restrictions on mail-in voting. The administration's order, issued in March, would direct the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to curate lists with the names of all citizens at least 18 years old in each state who are eligible to vote. The order would require the U.S. Postal Service to check the lists before sending out mail-in ballots. "This internal directive does not regulate the States’ voter registration processes," justices on the high court wrote. "Nor does it impinge on the States’ authority ‘to create and enforce a legal code’ for elections.'" A federal judge in Massachusetts issued an order on July 25 blocking the Trump administration from implementing the mail-in ballot restrictions nationwide. A group of 23 states and the District of Columbia sued to prevent the order from going into effect. Judge Indira Talwani allowed all 23 states to be exempt from the order. Solicitor General John Sauer argued that the lists have yet to be implemented in any state and the order should not be valid, since there was no harm incurred by the involved parties. "The respondent States have not suffered any cognizable injury caused by the Executive Order, because the Order itself does not affect their election processes at all, and it is entirely speculative whether and how any agency implementation may do so," Sauer said. Lawyers for the states said the administration could not move forward with an order this close to Election Day in the 2026 midterms. "Requiring that plaintiffs wait to challenge the EO’s implementing actions would cause them significant hardship and, as a practical matter, threaten to insulate the EO’s unlawful directives from judicial review before the upcoming elections," the lawyer's wrote. Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor opposed the high court's decision to move forward with the mail-in ballot order. The three liberal justices said the majority's decision does not address fundamental issues in the case that must be decided. "The Government has admitted that the lists 'might be used solely to facilitate this sort of post-election law-enforcement activity,'" Sotomayor wrote. Further legal challenges to the president's order are expected over the coming weeks that would prevent it from being implemented.

Génova reclama reforzar de inmediato las unidades de Extranjería desplazadas a Ceuta y trabajar las 24 horas para tramitar las repatriaciones de los migrantes que permanecen en la ciudad, mientras caldea el desfile de comparecencias de ministros.

A new nuclear research and training campus may be coming to Brigham City as the state advances its effort to build out an “energy ecosystem” in northern Utah.  Hi Tech Solutions, a nuclear power and energy services company that’s sponsoring a nuclear campus in Brigham City, signed a memorandum of understanding with the municipality and […]

The federal government has found a strange way to practice conservation: put billions of dollars on the table, then cut many of the people needed to turn that money into work on the ground. That is the disconnect South Dakota’s congressional delegation should be concerned about, because right now the two policies are moving in […]

(The Center Square) – A coalition of education and union groups sued the Trump administration, seeking to block a rule that would impose time limits on visas for international students, exchange visitors and foreign journalists. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, seeks to block a Department of Homeland Security rule from taking effect Sept. 15. The coalition argues the changes could disrupt international students’ education and discourage foreign students from coming to the United States. Under the rule, F visas for international students and J visas for exchange visitors would be limited to four years, and I visas for foreign journalists would be limited to 240 days. The plaintiffs, led by organizations like the NAFSA: Association of International Educators, Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration and the American Federation of Teachers, argue the rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act because it is arbitrary and capricious and was adopted without adequate procedural notice or consideration. “They will discourage foreign students and other nonimmigrants from coming to the United States, repelled by the intolerable prospect of losing lawful immigration status partway through their studies. Students will lose opportunities, schools will lose talent, and the public will lose billions of dollars of economic contributions supported by one of the United States’ top exports: education,” the lawsuit states. Miriam Feldblum, president and CEO of the Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, said in a statement that the new limits could interfere with students’ ability to complete their programs and make the United States less competitive in attracting international students. “This latest assault on knowledge by the Trump administration arbitrarily limits how long international scholars have to complete their studies and risks turning a welcoming environment for students into a hostile one,” AFT President Randi Weingarten said in a statement. The lawsuit comes as the Trump administration has moved to impose additional restrictions on immigration and foreign nationals in the United States. The Department of Homeland Security says the regulation eliminates the “duration of status” policy that allowed foreign students, exchange visitors and media representatives to remain in the United States without a fixed end date, subject to maintaining their status. DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin defended the rule, saying foreign students have been admitted indefinitely for decades, allowing some to “abuse our immigration system by perpetually enrolling in courses to avoid having to leave the U.S.” The White House deferred to DHS for comment, but The Center Square did not get a response in time for publication. The Center Square reached out to NAFSA: Association of International Educators, Presidents’ Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration and AFT for a comment but did not receive a response.

This is likely to be the hottest heat wave of the year — so far. Warnings from the National Weather Service are in effect from Tuesday morning through Friday evening.

The Padres introduced Jose E. Felciano and his wife Kwanza Jones as their new owners Monday. "The possibilities are limitless,” Jones said.

MKE REC and Near West Side Partners are excited to invite you to our first collaboration—a fun, family-friendly ride celebrating the end of the summer riding season! The post Post From Community: MKE REC Food Truck Forty with a 10 mile Soul Roll in the Near West Side appeared first on Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service.

ARBOREK, West Papua, Indonesia — “Rockhead fish, salamander fish, starfish and coral.” That’s what dozens of children from Arborek, a small island in Indonesia’s Raja Ampat archipelago, said when asked what they see in nature that is yellow and orange. The children rattled off the fish and other marine life they encounter when they play […]

Según la plataforma Meteored se presentará un clima irregular para este martes 24 y miércoles 25 de agosto en Antofagasta. La “Perla del Norte” presentaría leves precipitaciones por algunos momentos en la madrugada entre las 01:00 y 02:00 horas de ambos días. Se registraría una humedad del 97% en la zona. Además, es probable que […] Este artículo Pronostican leves precipitaciones para la madrugada de este martes y miércoles en Antofagasta fue publicado originalmente en El Diario de Antofagasta.

Oregon’s governor, chief election official and top lawyer vowed Monday to continue fighting President Donald Trump’s efforts to restrict mail ballots after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed Trump to continue implementing an executive order.

نهادهای مستقر در ایران که برای شناسایی و جمع‌آوری اطلاعات درباره نیروهای آمریکایی و متحدان آنها فعالیت می‌کردند و یک شبکه تأمین تجهیزات برای برنامه‌های نظامی و موشکی در ایران، در فهرست تحریم‌های آمریکا قرار گرفتند.

This free, family-friendly mental health fair combines fun activities with practical resources to help children and adults build healthy coping skills and support their emotional well-being. The post Post From Community: Wellness Wonderland brings mental health support and family fun to Milwaukee appeared first on Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service.

WICHABAI, Guyana — At sunrise in Guyana’s South Rupununi, Leroy Ignacio stops beside a tree scored with large claw marks. The animal responsible was a giant anteater. “They even rub their backs on the trunk to leave a scent behind,” says Ignacio, president of the South Rupununi Conservation Society (SRCS), as he demonstrates the motion. […]

(The Center Square) - Nevada sued the Trump administration Monday over its two-year plan to reduce water usage from the Colorado River. The move comes after the U.S. Department of Interior announced on Friday that Nevada, California and Arizona would be expected to make up all of a 2.5 million acre-feet water usage reduction from the Colorado River over the next two years. No cuts are being imposed on the four other Colorado River states: Colorado, Utah, New Mexico and Wyoming. “This isn’t about political posturing; this is a matter of survival for a community that represents about two-thirds of our state’s citizens and the lion’s share of its economy,” Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, a Republican, said in a statement announcing the lawsuit. Lombardo and his staff weren't available Monday for an interview. Nevada’s lawsuit comes in reaction to the Department of Interior’s much-anticipated Record of Decision from Friday, which outlined the next two years of water management on the Colorado River. The lawsuit was filed Monday in the Nevada U.S. District Court. It asked the courts to pause the water cuts put into place by the Record of Decision until, “numerous legal and technical shortcomings are resolved,” such as an economic review of the water cuts’ impact on the Southern Nevada economy. “I’ve spent over 25 years negotiating on the Colorado River – with one of the main goals being to stay out of court,” said John Entsminger, general manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority and Nevada’s lead negotiator for the Colorado River since 2014, Environmental advocates have previously called a legal battle over the Colorado River negotiations a lose-lose situation for all parties involved. But Entsminger told The Center Square that several parties had pointed out a lack of economic reviews in the Interior’s Record of Decision. He noted Nevada had told the Department of Interior it had serious problems with the plan prior to their lawsuit. One of the biggest decisions from the Record of Decision was the demanded 1.25 million acre-feet in reduced water usage from the Colorado River per year for both 2027 and 2028, with all of the reductions to come from Arizona, California and Nevada – known as the Colorado River’s Lower Basin. The three states would also be expected to voluntarily store an additional 700,000 acre-feet of water over the two years to help protect the region’s vulnerable dam system. Additionally, further water cuts could be required if water levels are too low to operate basic dam functions. The decision partially copies a proposal by the Lower Basin states from earlier in the year to make up the necessary water cuts, but does not include any cuts from the Upper Basin states, while adding the dam storage requirements. Entsminger said that Southern Nevada could lose up to 71% of its Colorado River allocation under the Record of Decision guidelines. “There would be a lot of health and human safety concerns.” Across the Colorado River Basin, the Department of Interior plan received mixed reactions from the seven Colorado River states that rely on the water source. The four Upper Basin states, spared from any water cuts, celebrated the announcement. In California, the Colorado River Board of California Chairman JB Hamby called the Record of Decision, “some badly needed near-term certainty at a moment of extraordinary risk,” in a statement. The Colorado River Board of California did not respond to questions from The Center Square on Nevada’s lawsuit, but said in its Record of Decision statement that the Upper Basin states needed to shoulder more of the water cuts weights. The Arizona Department of Water Resources similarly applauded the decision for creating an immediate plan amid the river’s uncertainty, while also calling for greater sacrifices from the Upper Basin states. In response to questions from The Center Square on Nevada’s lawsuit, ADWR Spokesperson Shauna Evans said the state was evaluating their next actions. “In fairness, people are probably digesting a pretty significant decision,” Entsminger said of the other Colorado Basin state’s lack of statements since Nevada’s lawsuit. He said he did not reach out to any of the other states to give warning of the lawsuit, but did reach out immediately after it was filed. Nevada’s statement said there was still no hearing scheduled for the lawsuit, and Entsminger refused to give a timeline. “Things like this can take a long time, and things like this can wrap up pretty quickly,” he said. Despite the lawsuit, Entsminger said Nevada was still open to a solution outside of the courtroom. “If people of good will get back to the negotiation process, we’re happy to meet them.” The Department of Interior refused to comment for this story because of the pending litigation.